26/2. Chapter:
Sahih Muslim 1639d — Same Meaning Through Mansur’s Chain
The Prohibition Of Vows, And Confirmation That They Do Not Avert Anything
Hadith About Vows: A Supporting Chain for the Warning
Sahih Muslim : 1639d
Sahih MuslimHadith Number 1639d
وَحَدَّثَنِي مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ رَافِعٍ، حَدَّثَنَا يَحْيَى بْنُ آدَمَ، حَدَّثَنَا مُفَضَّلٌ، ح وَحَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ، بْنُ الْمُثَنَّى وَابْنُ بَشَّارٍ قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ، عَنْ سُفْيَانَ، كِلاَهُمَا عَنْ مَنْصُورٍ، بِهَذَا الإِسْنَادِ نَحْوَ حَدِيثِ جَرِيرٍ .
This hadith has been narrated on the authority of Mansur with the same chain of transmitters.
Reference : Sahih Muslim 1639dIn-book reference : Book 26, Hadith 6USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 14, Hadith 4022
Summary of Sahih Muslim Hadith 1639d
This hadith about vows is a supporting report. It says the narration has been transmitted on the authority of Mansur with the same chain of transmitters, close to the wording of Jarir’s narration. Because it points back to the earlier report, its meaning should be understood with that warning: the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وسلم) forbade vows, and the vow does not avert the matter; it only extracts something from the miserly person. The value of this shorter hadith is in preservation. It shows that the same meaning came through a named route. For readers, this is a reminder to avoid building new lessons from a chain note alone, while still respecting the meaning it confirms.
What we learn from this hadith
- This narration supports the earlier wording about vows.
- The warning against taking vows remains the central meaning.
- A chain note should be read with the report it refers to.
- Hadith preservation includes repeated routes and close wording.
