3/21. Chapter:
Sahih Muslim 347b — Abu Ayyub’s Report
At the beginning of Islam, intercourse did not necessitate ghusl unless semen was emitted, then that was abrogated and ghusl becomes obligatory for intercourse
Hadith About the Same Wudu Teaching from Abu Ayyub
Sahih Muslim : 347b
Sahih MuslimHadith Number 347b
وَحَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ الْوَارِثِ بْنُ عَبْدِ الصَّمَدِ، حَدَّثَنِي أَبِي، عَنْ جَدِّي، عَنِ الْحُسَيْنِ، قَالَ يَحْيَى وَأَخْبَرَنِي أَبُو سَلَمَةَ، أَنَّ عُرْوَةَ بْنَ الزُّبَيْرِ، أَخْبَرَهُ أَنَّ أَبَا أَيُّوبَ أَخْبَرَهُ أَنَّهُ، سَمِعَ ذَلِكَ، مِنْ رَسُولِ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم .
Abu Ayyub Narrated from:
Abu Ayyub reported that he had heard like this from the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ).
Reference : Sahih Muslim 347bIn-book reference : Book 3, Hadith 104USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 3, Hadith 681
Summary of Sahih Muslim Hadith 347b
This narration is very short. Abu Ayyub reported that he had heard the same teaching from the Messenger of Allah صلى الله عليه وسلم. The text points back to the ruling mentioned before it: performing wudu and washing in the described case. Since this hadith does not restate the full wording, the explanation should stay careful and not build more than the report gives. Its value is that another Companion is connected to the same teaching from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم. People searching for Abu Ayyub wudu hadith, same purification hadith, or Sahih Muslim 347b can understand that this report supports the earlier wording in the chain of narrations. The main topic remains wudu and washing in the case of no emission.
What we learn from this hadith
- Abu Ayyub reported hearing the same teaching from the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم.
- The narration supports the previous purification report.
- It shows another Companion connected to the same instruction.
- The text itself is brief and should not be stretched beyond its wording.
