18/1. Chapter:
Sahih Muslim 1471d — Supporting Report on Divorce During Menses
The prohibition of divorcing a menstruating woman without her consent; If a man breaks this rule, it still counts as a divorce, and he should be ordered to take her back
Sahih Muslim 1471d: Divorce During Menses Report
Sahih Muslim : 1471d
Sahih MuslimHadith Number 1471d
وَحَدَّثَنَاهُ أَبُو بَكْرِ بْنُ أَبِي شَيْبَةَ، وَابْنُ الْمُثَنَّى، قَالاَ حَدَّثَنَا عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ إِدْرِيسَ، عَنْ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ، بِهَذَا الإِسْنَادِ . نَحْوَهُ وَلَمْ يَذْكُرْ قَوْلَ عُبَيْدِ اللَّهِ لِنَافِعٍ . قَالَ ابْنُ الْمُثَنَّى فِي رِوَايَتِهِ فَلْيَرْجِعْهَا . وَقَالَ أَبُو بَكْرٍ فَلْيُرَاجِعْهَا .
'Ubaidullah Narrated from:
A hadith like this has been narrated on the authority of 'Ubaidullah, but he made no mention of the words of Ubaidullah that he said to Nafi'.
Reference : Sahih Muslim 1471dIn-book reference : Book 18, Hadith 4USC-MSA web (English) reference : Book 9, Hadith 3476
Summary of Sahih Muslim Hadith 1471d
This narration is a supporting report of the same hadith about divorce during menses. It says that the hadith was narrated through the same chain, with similar wording, but without mentioning Ubaidullah's statement to Nafi. It also notes a wording difference: one narrator says he should return her, while another says he should take her back. Since the text is mainly about transmission, the explanation should not add new rulings beyond the report it supports. For readers searching for Sahih Muslim 1471d explanation, the value of this entry is that it preserves a close version of the same Ibn Umar divorce narration.
What we learn from this hadith
- The report supports the same account with similar wording.
- Small wording differences are recorded carefully.
- The narration does not add a new legal detail beyond the related report.
- Hadith transmission can preserve both the main meaning and wording notes.
