37/13. Chapter:
Sunan an-Nasai 4056 — Running Away and Joining the Enemy
The Differences Reported From Abu Ishaq
Runaway Slave Who Joins the Enemy: Jarir’s Statement
Sunan an-Nasai : 4056
Sunan an-NasaiHadith Number 4056
أَخْبَرَنَا عَلِيُّ بْنُ حُجْرٍ، قَالَ حَدَّثَنَا شَرِيكٌ، عَنْ أَبِي إِسْحَاقَ، عَنْ عَامِرٍ، عَنْ جَرِيرٍ، قَالَ أَيُّمَا عَبْدٍ أَبَقَ مِنْ مَوَالِيهِ وَلَحِقَ بِالْعَدُوِّ فَقَدْ أَحَلَّ بِنَفْسِهِ .
Jarir Narrated from:
Any slave who runs away from his masters and joins the enemy, he has made it permissible to shed his blood.
Reference : Sunan an-Nasa'i 4056In-book reference : Book 37, Hadith 91English translation : Vol. 5, Book 37, Hadith 4061
Summary of Sunan an-Nasai Hadith 4056
This report from Jarir uses the phrase joins the enemy. He says that any slave who runs away from his masters and joins the enemy has made himself liable to the stated consequence. The wording explains the issue more directly than reports that only say land of Shirk. The core topic is leaving one’s masters and defecting to an enemy side. Both parts are present in the text and should remain together. The narration does not discuss ordinary travel, personal disputes, or someone merely being absent. It speaks about joining the enemy. According to Islamic scholars, wartime legal status and punishment are matters for lawful authorities and courts. No individual may use this narration to threaten or attack another person based on a private accusation.
What we learn from this hadith
- The report combines running away with joining the enemy.
- Jarir presents the act as changing the runaway’s protected status.
- The text does not cover ordinary absence or private disagreement.
